Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 63245 for child support.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 63245 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, James received Huber privileges for work release. He explained the child support agency took partial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77807 - 2014-09-15
, James received Huber privileges for work release. He explained the child support agency took partial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77807 - 2014-09-15
Karen J. Miemietz v. George J. Miemietz
earned $51,000 annually. The court ordered him to pay $1,232 child support for their three children who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6337 - 2005-03-31
earned $51,000 annually. The court ordered him to pay $1,232 child support for their three children who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6337 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred regarding the placement of the children and child support and, further, that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75827 - 2014-09-15
erred regarding the placement of the children and child support and, further, that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75827 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was not contested and that the parties had waived maintenance, and further stated that child support would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75827 - 2011-12-28
was not contested and that the parties had waived maintenance, and further stated that child support would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75827 - 2011-12-28
Larry Taylor v. Robert A. Nuzzo
did not appreciate the benefit Taylor conferred upon him by supporting Nuzzo's biological child born
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10318 - 2005-03-31
did not appreciate the benefit Taylor conferred upon him by supporting Nuzzo's biological child born
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Larry Taylor v. Robert A. Nuzzo
the benefit Taylor conferred upon him by supporting Nuzzo's biological child born to Taylor's wife during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10318 - 2017-09-20
the benefit Taylor conferred upon him by supporting Nuzzo's biological child born to Taylor's wife during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10318 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
child support arrears. Based on our review of the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1120460 - 2026-05-21
child support arrears. Based on our review of the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1120460 - 2026-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
child support arrears. Based on our review of the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1120460 - 2026-05-21
child support arrears. Based on our review of the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1120460 - 2026-05-21
[PDF]
Angela M.W. v. William Kruzicki
, and mandates the conclusion that Chapter 48 uses the term "child" to mean a person born alive. In support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17056 - 2017-09-21
, and mandates the conclusion that Chapter 48 uses the term "child" to mean a person born alive. In support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17056 - 2017-09-21
Angela M.W. v. William Kruzicki
the conclusion that Chapter 48 uses the term "child" to mean a person born alive. In support, she asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17056 - 2005-03-31
the conclusion that Chapter 48 uses the term "child" to mean a person born alive. In support, she asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17056 - 2005-03-31