Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 1812 for indigency.

[PDF] State v. Justin D. Gudgeon
for an indigent defendant was a “unique constitutional defect,” Custis, 511 U.S. at 496, reasoning that “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25462 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jamie L. Pennington
not improved since the initial indigency determination.[5] Thus, while we suspect Pennington may have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5782 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rule Order
. If the person who is the subject of the case or proceeding claims to be indigent, the court shall refer
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=797506 - 2024-05-02

[PDF] Rules petition 05-07
the person’s his or her indigency was determined. 5. Whether the person requests representation
/supreme/docs/0507petition.pdf - 2010-01-20

[PDF] JoAnne M.N. v. Eau Claire County Department of Human Services
was indigent, she never completed paperwork for a court-appointed attorney, so one was not appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7543 - 2017-09-19

JoAnne M.N. v. Eau Claire County Department of Human Services
of the hearing at the Eau Claire county jail. ¶4 Although JoAnne was indigent, she never completed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7543 - 2005-03-31

05-07 In the matter of proposed amendments to Wis. Stat. ss. 809.107 and 809.14 (Effective 7-1-06)
financial circumstances have materially improved since the date on which the person's appellant's indigency
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25030 - 2006-05-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of Fees and Costs—Affidavit of Indigency and Order that you filed is only for filing fees. You may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197607 - 2017-10-11

Superb Video v. County of Kenosha
to indigent beyond the scope of a county's power because it abrogated state statutory scheme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7884 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
-indigent defendant. Failing to raise a meritless challenge is not deficient performance. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57439 - 2014-09-15