Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 96805 for state case.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 96805 for state case.
State v. Terry Penny
on September 30, 1995. The case was scheduled for trial on October 30, 1995, but a State’s witness was ill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12967 - 2005-03-31
on September 30, 1995. The case was scheduled for trial on October 30, 1995, but a State’s witness was ill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Diane Borchardt
to the defendant’s case must be found in order for the testimony to be improperly “frozen.” Id. The state’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11863 - 2017-09-21
to the defendant’s case must be found in order for the testimony to be improperly “frozen.” Id. The state’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11863 - 2017-09-21
State v. Larry Cook
testified favorably to the State in an unrelated criminal case against another defendant (the Britt case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9132 - 2005-03-31
testified favorably to the State in an unrelated criminal case against another defendant (the Britt case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9132 - 2005-03-31
State v. Susan Holloway
Complete Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9686 - 2005-03-31
Complete Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Williams
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10908 - 2017-09-20
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10908 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Roderick Bankston
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 97-2019-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12741 - 2017-09-21
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 97-2019-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12741 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Jones
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 97-2299-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12857 - 2017-09-21
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 97-2299-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12857 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Iran Evans
3 All the cases cited by Evans are inapposite. As an example, Evans cites State v. Billings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15457 - 2017-09-21
3 All the cases cited by Evans are inapposite. As an example, Evans cites State v. Billings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15457 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Pluim
WIS STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. No. 99-0618-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
WIS STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. No. 99-0618-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard Dodson
it. Because the state’s case had little other corroboration of [the victim’s] assertions, this information
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17113 - 2013-03-18
it. Because the state’s case had little other corroboration of [the victim’s] assertions, this information
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17113 - 2013-03-18