Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 6433 for wide.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 6433 for wide.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139836 - 2017-09-21
, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is wholly incongruous with Wisconsin law, which affords sentencing courts wide discretion in fashioning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247355 - 2019-09-25
is wholly incongruous with Wisconsin law, which affords sentencing courts wide discretion in fashioning
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247355 - 2019-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840483 - 2024-08-21
or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840483 - 2024-08-21
State v. Theresa M. Sobacki
), as follows: [T]he Fourteenth Amendment permits the States a wide scope of discretion in enacting laws which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
), as follows: [T]he Fourteenth Amendment permits the States a wide scope of discretion in enacting laws which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the sentencing court’s wide discretion. State v. Grady, 2007 WI 81, ¶31, 302 Wis. 2d 80, 734 N.W.2d 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96000 - 2013-04-30
the sentencing court’s wide discretion. State v. Grady, 2007 WI 81, ¶31, 302 Wis. 2d 80, 734 N.W.2d 364
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96000 - 2013-04-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
on the defendant to overcome a strong presumption that counsel acted reasonably within a wide range of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853935 - 2024-09-25
on the defendant to overcome a strong presumption that counsel acted reasonably within a wide range of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=853935 - 2024-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to explain why it imposed consecutive sentences. A circuit court has “wide discretion in determining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240670 - 2019-05-10
to explain why it imposed consecutive sentences. A circuit court has “wide discretion in determining
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240670 - 2019-05-10
State v. Clinton N. Mansker
. The weight to be given each of these factors is within the trial court’s wide discretion. Id. The sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12052 - 2005-03-31
. The weight to be given each of these factors is within the trial court’s wide discretion. Id. The sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12052 - 2005-03-31
Robert Walter Strong v. Maryann Strong
of the court, the court must consider a wide range of factors.” Id. at 552. These factors include whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15974 - 2005-03-31
of the court, the court must consider a wide range of factors.” Id. at 552. These factors include whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15974 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide range of professionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34815 - 2008-12-08
whether, in light of all the circumstances, the omissions fell outside the wide range of professionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34815 - 2008-12-08