Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 7573 for yes.
Search results 1171 - 1180 of 7573 for yes.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by a jury, that’s a whole different ballgame. THE DEFENDANT: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT: Then I don’t know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73674 - 2014-09-15
by a jury, that’s a whole different ballgame. THE DEFENDANT: Yes, ma’am. THE COURT: Then I don’t know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73674 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David M. Womble
. Do you understand that? THE DEFENDANT: Oh, yes. THE COURT: Okay. You understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15294 - 2017-09-21
. Do you understand that? THE DEFENDANT: Oh, yes. THE COURT: Okay. You understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15294 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the form. Lambert answered yes to both questions. On the form, defense counsel had written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36196 - 2009-04-15
on the form. Lambert answered yes to both questions. On the form, defense counsel had written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36196 - 2009-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
daughter, so yes, I didn’t believe her.” ¶7 On redirect examination, the prosecutor picked up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
daughter, so yes, I didn’t believe her.” ¶7 On redirect examination, the prosecutor picked up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
then asked if what his victim said was true and Ross replied, yes. Id. Ross was convicted of two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53089 - 2014-09-15
then asked if what his victim said was true and Ross replied, yes. Id. Ross was convicted of two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53089 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
if this were a jury deciding Mr. Streeter’s issue. They would simply answer the question yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
if this were a jury deciding Mr. Streeter’s issue. They would simply answer the question yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76273 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
implications for her comprehension: THE COURT: Are you taking medication? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
implications for her comprehension: THE COURT: Are you taking medication? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
THE DEFENDANT: Yes, we have. THE COURT: Are you satisfied you understand it? THE DEFENDANT: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44849 - 2014-09-15
THE DEFENDANT: Yes, we have. THE COURT: Are you satisfied you understand it? THE DEFENDANT: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44849 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
? Answer: Yes. 2. If you answered Question 1 “yes”, then answer this question: Was such negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132048 - 2014-12-22
? Answer: Yes. 2. If you answered Question 1 “yes”, then answer this question: Was such negligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132048 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
the headlock is the following testimony by Lien: Q. All right. Did you hit Mr. Heindl? A. Yes, I did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50428 - 2014-09-15
the headlock is the following testimony by Lien: Q. All right. Did you hit Mr. Heindl? A. Yes, I did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50428 - 2014-09-15