Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11701 - 11710 of 69139 for did.
Search results 11701 - 11710 of 69139 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
statements. While Janus did not instruct Eric to threaten Hicks, he told Eric “there wasn’t anything he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61888 - 2014-09-15
statements. While Janus did not instruct Eric to threaten Hicks, he told Eric “there wasn’t anything he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jimmie Baldwin
in the apartment where Robinson had last seen Baker prior to the shooting, that it was “Red E and them” who did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10125 - 2017-09-19
in the apartment where Robinson had last seen Baker prior to the shooting, that it was “Red E and them” who did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10125 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
store when he observed a vehicle make a u-turn in front of him, and then heard gunshots. K.S. did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528302 - 2022-06-07
store when he observed a vehicle make a u-turn in front of him, and then heard gunshots. K.S. did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528302 - 2022-06-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 174.001(5). The parties agree that Ardyce did not “own” or “keep” the dog under § 174.001(5). The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194202 - 2017-09-21
. § 174.001(5). The parties agree that Ardyce did not “own” or “keep” the dog under § 174.001(5). The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194202 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
deliberations. Because we conclude that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43011 - 2009-11-10
deliberations. Because we conclude that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Daniel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43011 - 2009-11-10
State v. James W. Breseman
plea, alleging that Breseman did not enter his plea with knowledge of the effect that 18 U.S.C. §§ 921
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13647 - 2005-03-31
plea, alleging that Breseman did not enter his plea with knowledge of the effect that 18 U.S.C. §§ 921
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13647 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Metz
, but, at that point, the officer remained outside the apartment. The officer did not have a warrant, and saw Metz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15259 - 2017-09-21
, but, at that point, the officer remained outside the apartment. The officer did not have a warrant, and saw Metz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15259 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeriline Campbell
of the circumstances, the arresting officer did have specific and articulable facts that amounted to a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
of the circumstances, the arresting officer did have specific and articulable facts that amounted to a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3151 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
out the administrative law judge (ALJ) in his revocation matter determined that Sorenson did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102211 - 2017-09-21
out the administrative law judge (ALJ) in his revocation matter determined that Sorenson did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102211 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
it is undisputed McDowell did not notify counsel of the alleged inaccuracies. ¶2 Three men, including McDowell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35053 - 2014-09-15
it is undisputed McDowell did not notify counsel of the alleged inaccuracies. ¶2 Three men, including McDowell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35053 - 2014-09-15