Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11701 - 11710 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 11701 - 11710 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by fifteen years of extended supervision. On the remaining count, the court withheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184281 - 2017-09-21
confinement followed by fifteen years of extended supervision. On the remaining count, the court withheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184281 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. ¶3 Seven months later, Mahowald filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121309 - 2014-09-08
’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision. ¶3 Seven months later, Mahowald filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121309 - 2014-09-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
by two years of extended supervision, consecutive to the 2003 case. The court denied Tucker sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93596 - 2014-09-15
by two years of extended supervision, consecutive to the 2003 case. The court denied Tucker sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93596 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision. Specifically, he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113225 - 2017-09-21
years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision. Specifically, he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113225 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
confinement and six years of extended supervision. In deciding the sentence, the court explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144593 - 2015-07-13
confinement and six years of extended supervision. In deciding the sentence, the court explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144593 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement, followed by fifteen years of extended supervision. Appellate counsel’s no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729715 - 2023-11-22
of initial confinement, followed by fifteen years of extended supervision. Appellate counsel’s no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729715 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and three years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673832 - 2023-07-05
confinement and three years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673832 - 2023-07-05
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement (I.C.) and fifteen years’ extended supervision (E.S.) on Count 1, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143100 - 2015-06-16
’ initial confinement (I.C.) and fifteen years’ extended supervision (E.S.) on Count 1, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143100 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
eleven and one-half years of initial confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
eleven and one-half years of initial confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, bifurcated as eight years’ initial confinement (IC) and twelve years’ extended supervision. The parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192143 - 2017-09-21
, bifurcated as eight years’ initial confinement (IC) and twelve years’ extended supervision. The parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192143 - 2017-09-21