Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11711 - 11720 of 57613 for a i x.

2010 WI APP 30
the motion to strike prior offenses, compared that, I read the State’s position on it. I might also add
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46000 - 2010-02-23

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Appeal No. 2006AP423 Cir. Ct. No. 2004CV4935 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27301 - 2006-12-04

COURT OF APPEALS
between the parties today requires that I ask you to impose a prison sentence a total of five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73090 - 2011-10-31

State v. Derrick Sandles
. Appeal No. 02-2622-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01 CF 4181 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5719 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 30
offenses, compared that, I read the State’s position on it. I might also add that I’ve had occasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46000 - 2014-09-15

State v. Ronald J. Frank
). We therefore affirm the judgment. I. Background ¶2 On April 12-13, 1997, Frank attended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3944 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
, it was his responsibility to ask the circuit court to correct the record. “Omnibus” issues Issue I ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7469 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and that the court’s denial of his motion was based on an error of law. I disagree and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694915 - 2023-08-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
? [Captain:] I got involved after I was made aware that Mr. Pritchard had been accidentally released from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176592 - 2017-09-21

State v. Luis R. Davila-Diaz
. Appeal No. 03-1371-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01CF005461 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6511 - 2005-03-31