Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11711 - 11720 of 16506 for commentating.
Search results 11711 - 11720 of 16506 for commentating.
COURT OF APPEALS
is unsupported by analysis and seems to conflict with a later comment by the court in its decision that, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32401 - 2008-04-09
is unsupported by analysis and seems to conflict with a later comment by the court in its decision that, had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32401 - 2008-04-09
State v. Kenneth J. Mathers
its discretion when it commented on Mathers’ continued claim of innocence. The trial court merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19321 - 2005-08-16
its discretion when it commented on Mathers’ continued claim of innocence. The trial court merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19321 - 2005-08-16
State v. Rodney A. King
, we reject King’s arguments because the context of the court’s comments demonstrates that its language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15582 - 2005-03-31
, we reject King’s arguments because the context of the court’s comments demonstrates that its language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15582 - 2005-03-31
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Lee J. B.
and written decisions, the trial court expressly considered and commented upon the standard and factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2657 - 2005-03-31
and written decisions, the trial court expressly considered and commented upon the standard and factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2657 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. The referee commented that from the referee's observation at the hearing, Attorney MacLean "clearly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169387 - 2017-09-21
. The referee commented that from the referee's observation at the hearing, Attorney MacLean "clearly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169387 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Shauna L. Conroy v. Marquette University
the knife and rhetorically commented something to the effect, “Do you want to get hurt?” However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11265 - 2017-09-19
the knife and rhetorically commented something to the effect, “Do you want to get hurt?” However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11265 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
some gratuitous comments; however, to what harm? Cynthia has not proven any. We note that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42901 - 2009-11-03
some gratuitous comments; however, to what harm? Cynthia has not proven any. We note that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42901 - 2009-11-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether the prosecutor’s comments deprived Duckett of the benefit he bargained for—a prison term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97931 - 2014-09-15
is whether the prosecutor’s comments deprived Duckett of the benefit he bargained for—a prison term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97931 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in the Comment section, the jury instruction committee explained the reasoning for this approach: Subsection (1m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91540 - 2013-01-14
in the Comment section, the jury instruction committee explained the reasoning for this approach: Subsection (1m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91540 - 2013-01-14
[PDF]
State v. Jack Williams
not have to prove them.” We agree and, therefore, here, as we have commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9559 - 2017-09-19
not have to prove them.” We agree and, therefore, here, as we have commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9559 - 2017-09-19