Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11711 - 11720 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 11711 - 11720 of 64042 for records/1000.
State v. Harold Richard Nero
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7576 - 2005-03-31
of twenty-two years and nine months. However, he argues that the trial court did not “state for the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7576 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, the no-merit report, and McDaniels’s response, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246769 - 2019-09-12
of the record, the no-merit report, and McDaniels’s response, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246769 - 2019-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Barry Howard
in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of record. State v. Mordica, 168 Wis.2d 593, 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9583 - 2017-09-19
in accordance with accepted legal standards and the facts of record. State v. Mordica, 168 Wis.2d 593, 602
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9583 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
345. ¶9 The circuit court’s credibility finding is supported by the record, which shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734097 - 2023-11-30
345. ¶9 The circuit court’s credibility finding is supported by the record, which shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734097 - 2023-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
id. ¶6 On review, we search the record for evidence that supports the circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65112 - 2014-09-15
id. ¶6 On review, we search the record for evidence that supports the circuit court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65112 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in waiving him into adult court because it (1) “failed to consider Joshua’s lack of a prior record” and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943351 - 2025-04-23
in waiving him into adult court because it (1) “failed to consider Joshua’s lack of a prior record” and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943351 - 2025-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that he had no prior criminal record. ¶4 The State recommended prison time in an unspecified amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
, and that he had no prior criminal record. ¶4 The State recommended prison time in an unspecified amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47199 - 2010-02-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“did bring these issues up before trial,” but our review of the record suggests that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550992 - 2022-08-02
“did bring these issues up before trial,” but our review of the record suggests that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550992 - 2022-08-02
[PDF]
Valley Bank v. David V. Jennings III
that the summary judgment record does not support the reduction of the redemption period from twelve to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8337 - 2017-09-19
that the summary judgment record does not support the reduction of the redemption period from twelve to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8337 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446258 - 2021-10-27
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446258 - 2021-10-27