Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11721 - 11730 of 68531 for did.
Search results 11721 - 11730 of 68531 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the dismissal would be “in the interests of justice.” The defense did not object to the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
that the dismissal would be “in the interests of justice.” The defense did not object to the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958252 - 2025-05-20
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Susan M. Cotten
: Dissented: Not Participating: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16413 - 2005-03-31
: Dissented: Not Participating: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., did not participate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16413 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin N. Dornbrook
that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Dornbrook pled no contest to two counts of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15176 - 2005-03-31
that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Dornbrook pled no contest to two counts of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15176 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
living room with his head down and his hands between his sister-in-law’s legs. The man, whom Robert did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46611 - 2010-02-01
living room with his head down and his hands between his sister-in-law’s legs. The man, whom Robert did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46611 - 2010-02-01
COURT OF APPEALS
). Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, his trial counsel was not ineffective, and he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33065 - 2008-06-17
). Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, his trial counsel was not ineffective, and he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33065 - 2008-06-17
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Virjean L.
was not prejudicial and trial counsel’s error did not affect the outcome of the proceeding, the order is affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26560 - 2017-09-21
was not prejudicial and trial counsel’s error did not affect the outcome of the proceeding, the order is affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26560 - 2017-09-21
Su Wings Corporation v. City of Lake Geneva
to the City, which it eventually did. After it reverted back, the Condoses then applied for the license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5241 - 2005-03-31
to the City, which it eventually did. After it reverted back, the Condoses then applied for the license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard Seider v. Connie O'Connell
that, while the rule did limit and restrict the applicability of the statute, the rule did not conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15
that, while the rule did limit and restrict the applicability of the statute, the rule did not conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13953 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kim A. Dasko
. This response prompted defense counsel to ask if Klipstein could sit fairly or not. She answered that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4340 - 2017-09-19
. This response prompted defense counsel to ask if Klipstein could sit fairly or not. She answered that she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4340 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 940.01(1)(a), 939.50(3)(a), and 939.63(1)(b) (2009- 10).[1] The imposed sentence, therefore, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13
. §§ 940.01(1)(a), 939.50(3)(a), and 939.63(1)(b) (2009- 10).[1] The imposed sentence, therefore, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13