Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11721 - 11730 of 69043 for had.
Search results 11721 - 11730 of 69043 for had.
[PDF]
Office of State Public Defenders v. Circuit Court for Dunn County
the SPD had neither notice nor an opportunity to be heard. Because the SPD was deprived of notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14125 - 2014-09-15
the SPD had neither notice nor an opportunity to be heard. Because the SPD was deprived of notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14125 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
slippery.” Upon her arrival, the officer observed the vehicle had been abandoned in the field. Shortly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71242 - 2011-09-21
slippery.” Upon her arrival, the officer observed the vehicle had been abandoned in the field. Shortly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71242 - 2011-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
.” According to the police report, the technician observed that the individual “had both hands in his front
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97417 - 2014-09-15
.” According to the police report, the technician observed that the individual “had both hands in his front
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97417 - 2014-09-15
State v. John C. Johnson
conclude that the officer had a reasonable suspicion to support a stop. Finally, Johnson contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2276 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the officer had a reasonable suspicion to support a stop. Finally, Johnson contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2276 - 2005-03-31
Town of Waterford v. Gary R. Anderson
. Gary R. Anderson appeals from a forfeiture judgment based upon a jury’s determination that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14256 - 2005-03-31
. Gary R. Anderson appeals from a forfeiture judgment based upon a jury’s determination that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14256 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harold W. Zastrow
is unnecessary. We affirm for three reasons, which we will address seriatim. ¶2 Zastrow had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2727 - 2017-09-19
is unnecessary. We affirm for three reasons, which we will address seriatim. ¶2 Zastrow had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2727 - 2017-09-19
Daniel J. Lenhart v. Robert L. Kisting
-turn only lane. Kisting indicated that he had been in the far left lane but had changed to the center
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11979 - 2005-03-31
-turn only lane. Kisting indicated that he had been in the far left lane but had changed to the center
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11979 - 2005-03-31
State v.
was based on an in-court identification at trial that had been tainted by an impermissibly suggestive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31
was based on an in-court identification at trial that had been tainted by an impermissibly suggestive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an earlier speedy trial demand, failing to question State witnesses if any of them had seen Fischer exit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211814 - 2018-04-23
an earlier speedy trial demand, failing to question State witnesses if any of them had seen Fischer exit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211814 - 2018-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
on the basis that the evidence failed to establish that Floyd had knowledge of the contents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103684 - 2013-10-30
on the basis that the evidence failed to establish that Floyd had knowledge of the contents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103684 - 2013-10-30