Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11731 - 11740 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 11731 - 11740 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court may deny the claim without a hearing. Id. We review de novo whether a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132234 - 2014-12-29
, the circuit court may deny the claim without a hearing. Id. We review de novo whether a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132234 - 2014-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes constitutionally ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939298 - 2025-04-16
, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes constitutionally ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939298 - 2025-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims and Toohey’s counterclaim. Raufmann appealed to the circuit court. ¶11 Following a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196379 - 2017-09-21
claims and Toohey’s counterclaim. Raufmann appealed to the circuit court. ¶11 Following a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196379 - 2017-09-21
Philip T. Sliwinski v. The Board of Fire and Police Commissioners of the City of Milwaukee
.” State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 31, 310 N.W.2d 607, 609 (1981); see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21576 - 2006-02-23
.” State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 31, 310 N.W.2d 607, 609 (1981); see also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21576 - 2006-02-23
State v. Randolph S. Miller
was inadequate under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5553 - 2005-03-31
was inadequate under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prosecutorial vindictiveness claims present questions of law that we review de novo. However, we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75247 - 2014-09-15
prosecutorial vindictiveness claims present questions of law that we review de novo. However, we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75247 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
or prejudicial is a question of law that we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90205 - 2012-12-05
or prejudicial is a question of law that we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90205 - 2012-12-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a condition of probation on the grounds that it is unconstitutional, we review the challenge de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529550 - 2022-06-08
a condition of probation on the grounds that it is unconstitutional, we review the challenge de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529550 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
(Ct. App. 1992). That is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We do not wish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
(Ct. App. 1992). That is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We do not wish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
(Ct. App. 1992). That is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We do not wish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13755 - 2014-09-15
(Ct. App. 1992). That is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We do not wish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13755 - 2014-09-15