Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11751 - 11760 of 63277 for records.
Search results 11751 - 11760 of 63277 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to which Hardy has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823214 - 2024-07-09
to which Hardy has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823214 - 2024-07-09
Paul Fochs v. John Buch
considered facts of record and its reasoning results in a rational and legally sound decision. See Burkes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13928 - 2005-03-31
considered facts of record and its reasoning results in a rational and legally sound decision. See Burkes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13928 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jayson D. Edwards v. Gary R. McCaughtry
the adjustment committee. However, the only record of his testimony consists of some notations which were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3797 - 2017-09-20
the adjustment committee. However, the only record of his testimony consists of some notations which were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3797 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145051 - 2015-07-28
of the no-merit report and response and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145051 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208873 - 2018-02-23
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208873 - 2018-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194715 - 2017-09-21
and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs No. 2019AP1773-CR 2 and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305616 - 2020-11-19
upon our review of the briefs No. 2019AP1773-CR 2 and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305616 - 2020-11-19
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97439 - 2013-05-28
of the no-merit report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97439 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel performed deficiently by failing to object to: (1) the admission of a video-recorded forensic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908220 - 2025-02-05
counsel performed deficiently by failing to object to: (1) the admission of a video-recorded forensic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908220 - 2025-02-05
State v. Tina H.
ordered by the court. The record reflects that the Department of Social Services complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13018 - 2005-03-31
ordered by the court. The record reflects that the Department of Social Services complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13018 - 2005-03-31