Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11781 - 11790 of 80052 for 任何超越自己权限制定的————，都是不合法的，也是无效的。 A、 教育文献 B、 教育政策 C、 教育法律 D、 教育法规.
Search results 11781 - 11790 of 80052 for 任何超越自己权限制定的————，都是不合法的，也是无效的。 A、 教育文献 B、 教育政策 C、 教育法律 D、 教育法规.
State v. Matthew A. Bennett
] By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15329 - 2005-03-31
] By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15329 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Brown
prepared that report, which stated that Brown “ha[d] completed sufficient [sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6527 - 2005-03-31
prepared that report, which stated that Brown “ha[d] completed sufficient [sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6527 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Torpen
. § 973.09 also addresses restitution. Wisconsin Stat. § 973.09(1)(b) states that the court “shall order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31
. § 973.09 also addresses restitution. Wisconsin Stat. § 973.09(1)(b) states that the court “shall order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3520 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven A. Conway
in violation of § 941.20(1)(b), Stats. Conway contends that manifest justice requires he be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13725 - 2005-03-31
in violation of § 941.20(1)(b), Stats. Conway contends that manifest justice requires he be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13725 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph A. Lombard
the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Peggy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16452 - 2005-03-31
the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Peggy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16452 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven A. Wienke
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Washington County: JAMES B. SCHWALBACH
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10008 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Washington County: JAMES B. SCHWALBACH
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10008 - 2005-03-31
State v. Catina A. McCoy
)(b)(4), Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10784 - 2005-03-31
)(b)(4), Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10784 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Prusinski
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11175 - 2005-03-31
and order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11175 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas A. Edmonston
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15798 - 2005-03-31
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15798 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald A. Lesavage
. Not recommended for publication in the official reports. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15409 - 2005-03-31
. Not recommended for publication in the official reports. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15409 - 2005-03-31