Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11781 - 11790 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 11781 - 11790 of 45836 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Lawrence R. Illingworth, Sr.
to a chemical test, as required by § 343.305, Stats., Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15163 - 2015-07-29
to a chemical test, as required by § 343.305, Stats., Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15163 - 2015-07-29
Town of Dunn v. Michael L. Woodman
not demonstrate that the field sobriety tests he performed were probative of whether he had been driving while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15244 - 2005-03-31
not demonstrate that the field sobriety tests he performed were probative of whether he had been driving while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Kitti
Kitti for OMVWI, the deputy had administered “another test … the breath test.” Kitti argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15381 - 2017-09-21
Kitti for OMVWI, the deputy had administered “another test … the breath test.” Kitti argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15381 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Dunn v. Michael L. Woodman
probable cause because the Town did not demonstrate that the field sobriety tests he performed were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15244 - 2017-09-21
probable cause because the Town did not demonstrate that the field sobriety tests he performed were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15244 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP2263-CR 2 results of her blood test because the implied consent law was violated when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189490 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP2263-CR 2 results of her blood test because the implied consent law was violated when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189490 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Gundlach
was unlawfully detained after he successfully performed field sobriety tests; and 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9179 - 2017-09-19
was unlawfully detained after he successfully performed field sobriety tests; and 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9179 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
to consent to provide a sample of his blood for a chemical test.2 On appeal, Ahmed argues that he properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776116 - 2024-03-14
to consent to provide a sample of his blood for a chemical test.2 On appeal, Ahmed argues that he properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776116 - 2024-03-14
State v. Ricki D. Bunnell
to a chemical test.[1] Bunnell contends that because he already had submitted to an intoxilyzer test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12086 - 2005-03-31
to a chemical test.[1] Bunnell contends that because he already had submitted to an intoxilyzer test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12086 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sandra L. Ludwigson
N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995), we set forth a three-pronged test to use when an allegedly intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12075 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995), we set forth a three-pronged test to use when an allegedly intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12075 - 2017-09-21
State v. Sandra L. Ludwigson
test to use when an allegedly intoxicated driver claims that a refusal to take a blood alcohol test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12075 - 2005-03-31
test to use when an allegedly intoxicated driver claims that a refusal to take a blood alcohol test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12075 - 2005-03-31