Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11791 - 11800 of 30164 for de.
Search results 11791 - 11800 of 30164 for de.
State v. Randolph S. Miller
was inadequate under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5560 - 2005-03-31
was inadequate under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5560 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
, 849 N.W.2d 693 (citation omitted). On appeal, we review de novo the circuit court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795955 - 2024-05-28
, 849 N.W.2d 693 (citation omitted). On appeal, we review de novo the circuit court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795955 - 2024-05-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. 1. “S.L. testified at trial that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48457 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. 1. “S.L. testified at trial that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48457 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Calumet County Department of Human Services v. Randall H.
the ultimate determination de novo but reversing the court's factual findings only if clearly erroneous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16507 - 2017-09-21
the ultimate determination de novo but reversing the court's factual findings only if clearly erroneous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16507 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶19 The determination of whether a judgment is ambiguous is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70226 - 2011-08-24
. ¶19 The determination of whether a judgment is ambiguous is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70226 - 2011-08-24
[PDF]
State v. Wesley H.
subject to this court’s de novo review. See State v. Adams, 152 Wis. 2d 68, 74, 447 N.W.2d 90 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3953 - 2017-09-20
subject to this court’s de novo review. See State v. Adams, 152 Wis. 2d 68, 74, 447 N.W.2d 90 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3953 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
court considered all issues de novo and ruled against the party). For these reasons, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34305 - 2008-11-13
court considered all issues de novo and ruled against the party). For these reasons, the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34305 - 2008-11-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
is the subject of a separate appeal. Tri-Corp now appeals. II. ANALYSIS. ¶14 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60800 - 2014-09-15
is the subject of a separate appeal. Tri-Corp now appeals. II. ANALYSIS. ¶14 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60800 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Linda Griffin v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2437 - 2017-09-19
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2437 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc.
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2826 - 2017-09-19
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2826 - 2017-09-19