Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11791 - 11800 of 24584 for extending.
Search results 11791 - 11800 of 24584 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not extend to creating an issue and making an argument for the litigant.” State ex rel. Harris v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231338 - 2018-12-28
not extend to creating an issue and making an argument for the litigant.” State ex rel. Harris v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231338 - 2018-12-28
[PDF]
William L. Genrich v. City of Rice Lake
to the council stated the purpose of the project was “the construction of South Street extended for access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25307 - 2017-09-21
to the council stated the purpose of the project was “the construction of South Street extended for access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25307 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ initial confinement and four years’ extended supervision on each count, concurrent to each other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65050 - 2014-09-15
’ initial confinement and four years’ extended supervision on each count, concurrent to each other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65050 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or extended the deadlines upon a showing of good cause. The no-merit report next addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732662 - 2023-11-28
or extended the deadlines upon a showing of good cause. The no-merit report next addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732662 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentenced Rutherford to thirty years of initial confinement and twenty years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195483 - 2017-09-21
sentenced Rutherford to thirty years of initial confinement and twenty years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP1884 2 agreed to recommend: (1) fifteen years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117034 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP1884 2 agreed to recommend: (1) fifteen years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117034 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derrick L. McCree
months of initial confinement followed by twenty months of extended supervision, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21118 - 2006-01-30
months of initial confinement followed by twenty months of extended supervision, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21118 - 2006-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement followed by five years of extended supervision. Out of a maximum total potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868938 - 2024-10-29
of initial confinement followed by five years of extended supervision. Out of a maximum total potential
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868938 - 2024-10-29
State v. David L. H.
’ confinement and ten years’ extended supervision on count one and probation on the remaining counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5818 - 2005-03-31
’ confinement and ten years’ extended supervision on count one and probation on the remaining counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5818 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶4 Cobbs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31510 - 2008-01-14
’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶4 Cobbs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31510 - 2008-01-14