Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11791 - 11800 of 18724 for quote.
Search results 11791 - 11800 of 18724 for quote.
COURT OF APPEALS
, 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984) (quoting United States v. Barnard, 490 F.2d 907, 912 (9th Cir. 1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33023 - 2008-06-16
, 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984) (quoting United States v. Barnard, 490 F.2d 907, 912 (9th Cir. 1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33023 - 2008-06-16
State v. Harris D. Byers
not as ambiguous as the quotation above would have us believe, but the quote makes a point: plain meaning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16356 - 2005-03-31
not as ambiguous as the quotation above would have us believe, but the quote makes a point: plain meaning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16356 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, 405 N.W.2d 344 (1987) (quoting State ex rel. Boostrom v. Bd. of Review, 42 Wis. 2d 149, 155, 166 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108217 - 2014-04-17
, 405 N.W.2d 344 (1987) (quoting State ex rel. Boostrom v. Bd. of Review, 42 Wis. 2d 149, 155, 166 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108217 - 2014-04-17
State v. Harris D. Byers
not as ambiguous as the quotation above would have us believe, but the quote makes a point: plain meaning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17549 - 2005-03-31
not as ambiguous as the quotation above would have us believe, but the quote makes a point: plain meaning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17549 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corporation
12 rule, the Court quoted East River's explanation of the rule’s importance: Since all
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17293 - 2017-09-21
12 rule, the Court quoted East River's explanation of the rule’s importance: Since all
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17293 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
The Martin court quoted Block v. State, 41 Wis. 2d 205, 210, 163 N.W.2d 196 (1968): The allegation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84833 - 2012-07-11
The Martin court quoted Block v. State, 41 Wis. 2d 205, 210, 163 N.W.2d 196 (1968): The allegation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84833 - 2012-07-11
[PDF]
State v. John M. Kieffer
the premises." Id. at 188 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 (1968)) (internal quotation marks
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17077 - 2017-09-21
the premises." Id. at 188 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 (1968)) (internal quotation marks
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17077 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2025XX001330 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Decision)
“apportionment” without any authority to reconsider or overturn our precedent. dissenting) (quoting
/supreme/docs/25xx1330order.pdf - 2025-11-25
“apportionment” without any authority to reconsider or overturn our precedent. dissenting) (quoting
/supreme/docs/25xx1330order.pdf - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
2025XX001438 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Decision)
“apportionment” without any authority to reconsider or overturn our precedent. dissenting) (quoting
/supreme/docs/25xx1438order.pdf - 2025-11-25
“apportionment” without any authority to reconsider or overturn our precedent. dissenting) (quoting
/supreme/docs/25xx1438order.pdf - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
State v. Sherrie S. Tucker
Cir. 1994) (quoting Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 453 (1895)). ¶19 As illustrated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16455 - 2017-09-21
Cir. 1994) (quoting Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 453 (1895)). ¶19 As illustrated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16455 - 2017-09-21