Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11791 - 11800 of 69353 for satisfaction of judgment.

COURT OF APPEALS
Michael Salinas, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143393 - 2015-06-22

COURT OF APPEALS
herein as of the date the Complaint was filed.” Both parties moved for summary judgment. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118460 - 2014-07-28

COURT OF APPEALS
. Morrison, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36519 - 2009-05-18

COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43881 - 2009-11-24

COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago County: Karen L. Seifert, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106831 - 2014-01-15

COURT OF APPEALS
appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the Town of Summit, n/k/a Village of Summit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69453 - 2011-08-16

COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: daniel l. konkol, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53085 - 2010-08-09

COURT OF APPEALS
dismissal upon summary judgment of his claims against the Kenosha Achievement Center, Inc., Philadelphia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136500 - 2015-03-03

COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration. To the extent that Jones was challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34069 - 2008-09-22

COURT OF APPEALS
, for the proposition that “a judgment is binding on the parties and may not be attacked in a collateral action unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31474 - 2008-01-15