Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1181 - 1190 of 6253 for cf.
Search results 1181 - 1190 of 6253 for cf.
Douglas Needham v. Leila Bailie
by affirmations of the will’s existence by the testator. Cf. Quantius v. Cotter, 47 Wis.2d 769, 779, 178 N.W.2d 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
by affirmations of the will’s existence by the testator. Cf. Quantius v. Cotter, 47 Wis.2d 769, 779, 178 N.W.2d 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conducted a review of the record and considered the arguable merits of an appeal. Cf. State v. Allen
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226914 - 2018-11-08
conducted a review of the record and considered the arguable merits of an appeal. Cf. State v. Allen
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226914 - 2018-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
distinguishable from the agreed-upon sentencing recommendation. Cf. State v. Clement, 153 Wis. 2d 287, 301-02
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
distinguishable from the agreed-upon sentencing recommendation. Cf. State v. Clement, 153 Wis. 2d 287, 301-02
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
State v. Sisakhone S. Douangmala
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2140-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-991 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4280 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2140-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-991 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4280 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eric R. George
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2785-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-136 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4497 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 01-2785-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-136 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4497 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carl D. Porter
for reversal. See Simmons v. U.S., 390 U.S. 377, 384 (1968); cf. Foster v. California, 394 U.S. 440, 443
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10684 - 2017-09-20
for reversal. See Simmons v. U.S., 390 U.S. 377, 384 (1968); cf. Foster v. California, 394 U.S. 440, 443
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10684 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Louis Ray
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-1090-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-153 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5187 - 2017-09-19
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-1090-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-153 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5187 - 2017-09-19
State v. Harrison Franklin
and its witnesses. Cf. id. at 379-80, 477 N.W.2d at 662. We further note that nothing in Franklin’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12262 - 2005-03-31
and its witnesses. Cf. id. at 379-80, 477 N.W.2d at 662. We further note that nothing in Franklin’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
not restricted to a “defined, limited portion of the citizenry.” Cf. City of Kenosha, 142 Wis. 2d at 557-58
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35972 - 2014-09-15
not restricted to a “defined, limited portion of the citizenry.” Cf. City of Kenosha, 142 Wis. 2d at 557-58
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35972 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
/declaratory judgment. Cf. O’Neill, 186 Wis. 2d at 234-35 (Absent a showing of a ground for relief under WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97925 - 2014-09-15
/declaratory judgment. Cf. O’Neill, 186 Wis. 2d at 234-35 (Absent a showing of a ground for relief under WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97925 - 2014-09-15