Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1181 - 1190 of 9547 for jurors.
Search results 1181 - 1190 of 9547 for jurors.
COURT OF APPEALS
a peremptory challenge of a juror after both parties had accepted the jury; (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32972 - 2008-06-09
a peremptory challenge of a juror after both parties had accepted the jury; (3) the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32972 - 2008-06-09
State v. Edward A. Murillo
by referring to jurors by number rather than name. In State v. Britt, 203 Wis. 2d 25, 34, 553 N.W.2d 528 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2421 - 2005-03-31
by referring to jurors by number rather than name. In State v. Britt, 203 Wis. 2d 25, 34, 553 N.W.2d 528 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2421 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to withdraw a peremptory challenge of a juror after both parties had accepted the jury; (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32972 - 2014-09-15
to withdraw a peremptory challenge of a juror after both parties had accepted the jury; (3) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32972 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Terron Napper
it was discovered post-verdict that a juror recognized a defense character witness; and (4) failing to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8364 - 2017-09-19
it was discovered post-verdict that a juror recognized a defense character witness; and (4) failing to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8364 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William Napper
it was discovered post-verdict that a juror recognized a defense character witness; and (4) failing to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8365 - 2017-09-19
it was discovered post-verdict that a juror recognized a defense character witness; and (4) failing to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Edward A. Murillo
asserts that the court improperly exercised its discretion by referring to jurors by number rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2421 - 2017-09-19
asserts that the court improperly exercised its discretion by referring to jurors by number rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2421 - 2017-09-19
State v. William Napper
that a juror recognized a defense character witness; and (4) failing to order an in camera review of the post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
that a juror recognized a defense character witness; and (4) failing to order an in camera review of the post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terron Napper
that a juror recognized a defense character witness; and (4) failing to order an in camera review of the post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8364 - 2005-03-31
that a juror recognized a defense character witness; and (4) failing to order an in camera review of the post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8364 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
, Hennings’s lawyer told the trial court that an alternate juror, Thomas Buchanan, had a conversation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
, Hennings’s lawyer told the trial court that an alternate juror, Thomas Buchanan, had a conversation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19667 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles Edward Hennings
was extraneous information. As an offer of proof, Hennings’s lawyer told the trial court that an alternate juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19
was extraneous information. As an offer of proof, Hennings’s lawyer told the trial court that an alternate juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19667 - 2005-09-19