Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1181 - 1190 of 6638 for mix.

Marian Stanisz v. Irene Hastings
these criteria is a mixed question of law and fact.” Id. “The question of the application of a description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9758 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gerald D. Taylor
sentence. ¶12 In reviewing this issue our standard is mixed; we review historical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7102 - 2005-03-31

Village of Menomonee Falls v. Bryan Preuss
was exclusively residential. He changed it to a mixed commercial/residential establishment. This was a change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13615 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Russell W. Weber v. Terrence M. Crossin
representations about the septic tank. This case presents a mixed question of law and fact. An appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15503 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. State v. Sanchez, 201 Wis. 2d 219, 236, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219063 - 2018-09-19

[PDF] Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
). Generally, review of an unjust enrichment determination presents a mixed question of fact and law. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15323 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Patricia G. Hass
were deficient No(s). 97-1510-CR 97-2208-CR 4 or prejudicial is a mixed question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12818 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel present mixed questions of law and fact. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 698
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44484 - 2009-12-09

[PDF] NOTICE
.” Section 48.02(14g). ¶10 We apply a mixed standard of review to the trial court’s decision to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31177 - 2014-09-15

State v. Bryon P. Cibrario
requested presents a mixed standard of review. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26279 - 2006-08-22