Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11801 - 11810 of 63276 for records.
Search results 11801 - 11810 of 63276 for records.
State v. Johnnie Hunter
that the computer print-out of his record might have been inaccurate in that respect. Hunter told the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8346 - 2005-03-31
that the computer print-out of his record might have been inaccurate in that respect. Hunter told the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8346 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darnell Stevens
has filed a response. As required by Anders, this court has independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8502 - 2005-03-31
has filed a response. As required by Anders, this court has independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8502 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. A sentencing court properly exercises its discretion when it states on the record its reasons for selecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55260 - 2014-09-15
. A sentencing court properly exercises its discretion when it states on the record its reasons for selecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55260 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James D. Curtis
K. Brennan. Nevertheless, for reasons that are not clear in the record, Judge Kremers did preside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19
K. Brennan. Nevertheless, for reasons that are not clear in the record, Judge Kremers did preside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his motion for postconviction relief.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
his motion for postconviction relief.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252876 - 2020-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pleas. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194109 - 2017-09-21
pleas. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194109 - 2017-09-21
Patricia Luchsinger v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
deposition that she would "have to go back and look at her records" to substantiate her wage loss claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10306 - 2005-03-31
deposition that she would "have to go back and look at her records" to substantiate her wage loss claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10306 - 2005-03-31
State v. Garth E. Coates
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8747 - 2005-03-31
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965423 - 2025-06-05
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Lemieux could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121607 - 2014-09-09
review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Lemieux could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121607 - 2014-09-09