Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11821 - 11830 of 80052 for 任何超越自己权限制定的————,都是不合法的,也是无效的。 A、 教育文献 B、 教育政策 C、 教育法律 D、 教育法规.

State v. George A. Faucher
: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17304 - 2005-03-31

State v. Darryl A. Harding
. He testified that he did so “[b]ased on the circumstance that there was a previous theft in Elm Grove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brad A. Raddeman
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) pursuant to § 346.63(1)(b).[3] Raddeman challenged the State’s dual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2157 - 2011-06-22

State v. Bruce A. Rumage
. By the Court.—Orders affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15957 - 2011-06-22

State v. Ricky A. Bright
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2000 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk, Court of Appeal...
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15963 - 2005-03-31

State v. Charles A. Dunlap
of evidence is a decision left to the discretion of the circuit court. See Michael R. B. v. State, 175 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15898 - 2009-09-14

State v. David A. Morris
imposition of sentence after trial. (b) The categories in par. (a) include custody of the convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2329 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tod A. Bergemann
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13452 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas A. Greve
PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK, J. This case is before us on certification from the court of appeals. The three
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16667 - 2005-03-31

State v. Barbara A. Buettner
of § 961.41(b), Stats.[1] She contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to enlarge the time
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12349 - 2005-03-31