Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11821 - 11830 of 43023 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Set Sudimoro Pacitan.
Search results 11821 - 11830 of 43023 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Set Sudimoro Pacitan.
COURT OF APPEALS
). A “‘new factor’” is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83782 - 2012-06-18
). A “‘new factor’” is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83782 - 2012-06-18
Frontsheet
with the reasoning set forth in Justice Roggensack's and Justice Ziegler's orders and for the same reasons I
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86095 - 2012-08-09
with the reasoning set forth in Justice Roggensack's and Justice Ziegler's orders and for the same reasons I
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86095 - 2012-08-09
[PDF]
WI 130
shall have the authority to set the period of extension up to six months, which
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30757 - 2014-09-15
shall have the authority to set the period of extension up to six months, which
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30757 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
in granting the four-year injunction because the court set a time for a hearing on the petition even though
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132092 - 2014-12-18
in granting the four-year injunction because the court set a time for a hearing on the petition even though
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132092 - 2014-12-18
[PDF]
WI 130
shall have the authority to set the period of extension up to six months, which
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30757 - 2014-09-15
shall have the authority to set the period of extension up to six months, which
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30757 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Renee E. Salinas v. Mickellette Chicini
order entered by the trial court. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8150 - 2017-09-19
order entered by the trial court. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8150 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey A. Cobb
it to be the duty and responsibility of this court to carefully examine the record before setting aside a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8453 - 2005-03-31
it to be the duty and responsibility of this court to carefully examine the record before setting aside a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8453 - 2005-03-31
State v. Franklin G. Van Wormer
was not unconstitutionally delayed. The forty-eight-hour rule set forth in County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9909 - 2005-03-31
was not unconstitutionally delayed. The forty-eight-hour rule set forth in County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9909 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Franklin G. Van Wormer
, Van Wormer's preliminary hearing was not unconstitutionally delayed. The forty-eight-hour rule set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9909 - 2017-09-19
, Van Wormer's preliminary hearing was not unconstitutionally delayed. The forty-eight-hour rule set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9909 - 2017-09-19
State v. John W. Grulich
a criminal prosecution set out in § 343.44(2)(e) does not apply. Here, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9676 - 2005-03-31
a criminal prosecution set out in § 343.44(2)(e) does not apply. Here, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9676 - 2005-03-31