Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11821 - 11830 of 83653 for case search.
Search results 11821 - 11830 of 83653 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the releases. ¶3 The court consolidated the cases and held a hearing on the motions in March 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89091 - 2014-09-15
of the releases. ¶3 The court consolidated the cases and held a hearing on the motions in March 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89091 - 2014-09-15
Village of Deerfield v.
-evidence rule was not at issue in the case and was never discussed by the court in the course of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11781 - 2005-03-31
-evidence rule was not at issue in the case and was never discussed by the court in the course of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11781 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 Nos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094583 - 2026-03-26
at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 Nos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094583 - 2026-03-26
CA Blank Order
convictions, and mandatory only for a select few, see Wis. Stat. § 973.046(1r) (2011-12). This case would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141209 - 2015-04-29
convictions, and mandatory only for a select few, see Wis. Stat. § 973.046(1r) (2011-12). This case would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141209 - 2015-04-29
State v. Jeffrey L. Leggions
at his handcuff case, which was on Parr’s belt. Leggions ripped the snap off the case. Eventually, Parr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31
at his handcuff case, which was on Parr’s belt. Leggions ripped the snap off the case. Eventually, Parr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533274 - 2022-06-16
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533274 - 2022-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44738 - 2010-01-05
Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44738 - 2010-01-05
State v. Dillis V. Allen
open file policy. The trial court’s order in this case does not ignore Schoepp as Allen argues; rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3605 - 2005-03-31
open file policy. The trial court’s order in this case does not ignore Schoepp as Allen argues; rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3605 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
-in-Sentencing, WISBAR.ORG, May 2000, available at http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search&template
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59277 - 2014-09-15
-in-Sentencing, WISBAR.ORG, May 2000, available at http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search&template
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59277 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel F. Kratochwill
certain potential constitutional challenges to the State's case against him. He also claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10390 - 2005-03-31
certain potential constitutional challenges to the State's case against him. He also claims that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10390 - 2005-03-31