Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11831 - 11840 of 30153 for de.
Search results 11831 - 11840 of 30153 for de.
State v. Chester B. Woods
, we review de novo whether the evidence before the circuit court was legally sufficient to support its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14319 - 2005-03-31
, we review de novo whether the evidence before the circuit court was legally sufficient to support its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14319 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey Samson v. Mary Samson
, 502 N.W.2d 918, 925 (Ct. App. 1993). We review conclusions of law de novo. See id. at 147, 502 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14354 - 2005-03-31
, 502 N.W.2d 918, 925 (Ct. App. 1993). We review conclusions of law de novo. See id. at 147, 502 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14354 - 2005-03-31
Robert A. Benkoski v. Mark A. Flood
to a given set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. See Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14242 - 2005-03-31
to a given set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. See Voss v. City of Middleton, 162 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14242 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
was prejudiced are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27936 - 2007-01-29
was prejudiced are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27936 - 2007-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discussed the standard of review for this issue. See id., ¶14. The defendant asserted that de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270980 - 2020-07-21
discussed the standard of review for this issue. See id., ¶14. The defendant asserted that de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270980 - 2020-07-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶13 We first consider the Borchardts’ argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35980 - 2014-09-15
a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶13 We first consider the Borchardts’ argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35980 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
43, ¶9, 397 Wis. 2d 17, 959 N.W.2d 305. We review a summary- judgment decision de novo, using
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488611 - 2022-04-12
43, ¶9, 397 Wis. 2d 17, 959 N.W.2d 305. We review a summary- judgment decision de novo, using
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488611 - 2022-04-12
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263058 - 2020-06-11
, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263058 - 2020-06-11
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
(Ct. App. 1992). That is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We do not wish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
(Ct. App. 1992). That is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We do not wish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews the question of whether the trial court applied the correct legal standard de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780571 - 2024-03-27
reviews the question of whether the trial court applied the correct legal standard de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780571 - 2024-03-27