Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11831 - 11840 of 77113 for judgment for u s.

COURT OF APPEALS
conviction was based largely on the trial court’s acceptance of victim A.K.’s testimony and rejection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66208 - 2011-06-20

Frontsheet
rather than the Wis. Stat. §§ 178.32-.33(1) wind-up statutes, awarded the Estate a net judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32861 - 2008-05-28

[PDF] WI 48
the Estate a net judgment of $119,735.35, which reflected calculations of James' interest on the date
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32861 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Microsoft Word - 14-01 Draft Final Order REVISED BLACKLINE with draft information
those issues, and a copy of any unpublished opinion cited under s. 809.23 (3) (a) or (b
/supreme/docs/1401draftorder.pdf - 2015-02-04

State v. Roosevelt Williams
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MAXINE A. WHITE, Judge.[1] Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11024 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mark W. Roob
. APPEAL from a judgment and orders of the circuit court for Waukesha County: DONALD J. HASSIN, JR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4665 - 2017-09-19

Diane M. Wettstaedt v. Gary E. Wettstaedt
judgment, Gary pays Diane maintenance in the amount of $279.10 per week, or approximately $1,200 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3250 - 2005-03-31

WI App 80 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1989-CR Complete Title...
, v. Russell S. Krancki, Defendant-Appellant.† Opinion Filed: June 18, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114460 - 2014-07-29

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
Jeffery Hoeft, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28145 - 2007-02-20

[PDF] Diane M. Wettstaedt v. Gary E. Wettstaedt
in the divorce judgment, asserting “that the immediate value of [wife]’s interest in his pension under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3250 - 2017-09-19