Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11831 - 11840 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 11831 - 11840 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Pfaff
No. 99-1005-CR-LV 3 recall that when you ran Mr. Pfaff’s record, you saw that he had previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15393 - 2017-09-21
No. 99-1005-CR-LV 3 recall that when you ran Mr. Pfaff’s record, you saw that he had previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15393 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the orders because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271848 - 2020-07-22
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the orders because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271848 - 2020-07-22
Kathy Schmidt v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
is simply no basis on this record to conclude that [Schmidt] was better qualified than Ms. Blount who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7918 - 2005-03-31
is simply no basis on this record to conclude that [Schmidt] was better qualified than Ms. Blount who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7918 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
State v. Michael J. Vandenheuvel
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26351 - 2006-09-05
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26351 - 2006-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, or that the risk was unreasonable and substantial. However, he contends that nothing in the record provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46317 - 2010-02-02
, or that the risk was unreasonable and substantial. However, he contends that nothing in the record provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46317 - 2010-02-02
CA Blank Order
modification. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
modification. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded that there were no meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27037 - 2006-11-06
response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded that there were no meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27037 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105120 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the no-merit report, Blunt’s response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27037 - 2014-09-15
the no-merit report, Blunt’s response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27037 - 2014-09-15