Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11831 - 11840 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 11831 - 11840 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Pfaff
No. 99-1005-CR-LV 3 recall that when you ran Mr. Pfaff’s record, you saw that he had previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15393 - 2017-09-21
No. 99-1005-CR-LV 3 recall that when you ran Mr. Pfaff’s record, you saw that he had previous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15393 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
State v. Michael J. Vandenheuvel
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26351 - 2006-09-05
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26351 - 2006-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, or that the risk was unreasonable and substantial. However, he contends that nothing in the record provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46317 - 2010-02-02
, or that the risk was unreasonable and substantial. However, he contends that nothing in the record provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46317 - 2010-02-02
CA Blank Order
modification. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
modification. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103528 - 2013-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded that there were no meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27037 - 2006-11-06
response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded that there were no meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27037 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
the no-merit report, Blunt’s response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27037 - 2014-09-15
the no-merit report, Blunt’s response and conducted an independent review of the record. We concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27037 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308670 - 2020-12-02
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308670 - 2020-12-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of certain conditions. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884804 - 2024-12-04
of certain conditions. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884804 - 2024-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574051 - 2022-10-05
and conducting an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574051 - 2022-10-05