Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11831 - 11840 of 73032 for we.
Search results 11831 - 11840 of 73032 for we.
Shannon Labine v. Stephen Puckett
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Dismissed. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We dismiss the petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16676 - 2005-03-31
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Dismissed. ¶1 PER CURIAM. We dismiss the petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16676 - 2005-03-31
Sandra Kube v. Thomas A. Pietruszka
and that he has a meritorious defense to the eviction action. Because we conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14917 - 2005-03-31
and that he has a meritorious defense to the eviction action. Because we conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14917 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
stopped Kallenberg’s vehicle had reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69508 - 2011-08-16
stopped Kallenberg’s vehicle had reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69508 - 2011-08-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reconsideration. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
for reconsideration. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020803 - 2025-10-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910139 - 2025-02-06
on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910139 - 2025-02-06
09AP743 State v. Geraldine Booker.doc
light for the same incident. While we agree that two citations for the same incident would constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40440 - 2009-09-08
light for the same incident. While we agree that two citations for the same incident would constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40440 - 2009-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of the preliminary examination. We affirm on both procedural and substantive grounds. ¶2 Rowell was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57748 - 2010-12-13
of the preliminary examination. We affirm on both procedural and substantive grounds. ¶2 Rowell was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57748 - 2010-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, counsel’s report, and Dorton’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131575 - 2017-09-21
the record, counsel’s report, and Dorton’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131575 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(“the Department”). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2020AP1322 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373094 - 2021-06-03
(“the Department”). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2020AP1322 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=373094 - 2021-06-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the correct legal standard. Because we conclude that the circuit court properly reconsidered the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41947 - 2014-09-15
on the correct legal standard. Because we conclude that the circuit court properly reconsidered the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41947 - 2014-09-15