Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11841 - 11850 of 80052 for 任何超越自己权限制定的————，都是不合法的，也是无效的。 A、 教育文献 B、 教育政策 C、 教育法律 D、 教育法规.
Search results 11841 - 11850 of 80052 for 任何超越自己权限制定的————，都是不合法的，也是无效的。 A、 教育文献 B、 教育政策 C、 教育法律 D、 教育法规.
State v. George A. Faucher
: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17304 - 2005-03-31
: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17304 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darryl A. Harding
. He testified that he did so “[b]ased on the circumstance that there was a previous theft in Elm Grove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31
. He testified that he did so “[b]ased on the circumstance that there was a previous theft in Elm Grove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4008 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Morris
imposition of sentence after trial. (b) The categories in par. (a) include custody of the convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2329 - 2005-03-31
imposition of sentence after trial. (b) The categories in par. (a) include custody of the convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2329 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tod A. Bergemann
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13452 - 2005-03-31
. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13452 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas A. Greve
PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK, J. This case is before us on certification from the court of appeals. The three
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16667 - 2005-03-31
PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK, J. This case is before us on certification from the court of appeals. The three
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16667 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
of § 961.41(b), Stats.[1] She contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to enlarge the time
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12349 - 2005-03-31
of § 961.41(b), Stats.[1] She contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to enlarge the time
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12349 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose A. Arellano
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19790 - 2005-10-04
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19790 - 2005-10-04
State v. Patricia A. Ziebell
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4241 - 2005-03-31
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4241 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
by use or threat of use of a dangerous weapon contrary to §§ 940.225(1)(b) and 939.32(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14408 - 2005-03-31
by use or threat of use of a dangerous weapon contrary to §§ 940.225(1)(b) and 939.32(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14408 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. M.
. Stat. § 908.08(3)(c), which requires a showing of the child’s “understanding that false statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21520 - 2006-02-22
. Stat. § 908.08(3)(c), which requires a showing of the child’s “understanding that false statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21520 - 2006-02-22