Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11841 - 11850 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 11841 - 11850 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing, the court found Albert in contempt of court and denied his motion to modify the temporary order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106577 - 2014-01-13
hearing, the court found Albert in contempt of court and denied his motion to modify the temporary order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106577 - 2014-01-13
State v. David Eric Williams
the order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Williams argues that: (1) the trial court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15198 - 2005-03-31
the order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal, Williams argues that: (1) the trial court lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Eric Williams
issued the order denying Williams’s motion for postconviction relief. No. 99-0562-CR 2 ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15198 - 2017-09-21
issued the order denying Williams’s motion for postconviction relief. No. 99-0562-CR 2 ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15198 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
as a third offense. Ms. Randall filed two motions to suppress the results of the blood test. In one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243158 - 2019-08-27
as a third offense. Ms. Randall filed two motions to suppress the results of the blood test. In one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243158 - 2019-08-27
[PDF]
Microsoft Word - Mitchell First Brief CORRECTED
Mitchell’s suppression motion and remand the matter to the trial court with instructions to grant
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/mitchell.pdf - 2018-04-04
Mitchell’s suppression motion and remand the matter to the trial court with instructions to grant
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/mitchell.pdf - 2018-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the Dane County Circuit Court denying his postconviction motions. No. 2022AP156-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613971 - 2023-01-26
of the Dane County Circuit Court denying his postconviction motions. No. 2022AP156-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613971 - 2023-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS
–12).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion for resentencing. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112198 - 2014-05-12
–12).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion for resentencing. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112198 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for resentencing. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112198 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion for resentencing. He argues that he is entitled to resentencing because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112198 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(the “August 2016 case”). 2 He also appeals the orders denying his motions for a new trial. 3 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213814 - 2018-06-05
(the “August 2016 case”). 2 He also appeals the orders denying his motions for a new trial. 3 ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213814 - 2018-06-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denied his post-sentencing motion for plea withdrawal without an evidentiary hearing. His motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749246 - 2024-01-09
denied his post-sentencing motion for plea withdrawal without an evidentiary hearing. His motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749246 - 2024-01-09