Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11841 - 11850 of 63577 for records.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
report. Upon consideration of the filings and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612442 - 2023-01-25

State v. Johnnie Hunter
that the computer print-out of his record might have been inaccurate in that respect. Hunter told the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8346 - 2005-03-31

State v. Albert Steven Winfrey
his trial counsel. This claim is waived for lack of a proper record. In order to obtain appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7907 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the record supports an arguably meritorious claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249332 - 2019-10-30

[PDF] Patricia Luchsinger v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
would "have to go back and look at her records" to substantiate her wage loss claim. The court felt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10306 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97439 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
pleas. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194109 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
., 38 Wis. 2d 656, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80273 - 2014-09-15

State v. Steven T. Fink
of self-representation with Fink. Because the record otherwise fails to establish that Fink was made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4909 - 2005-03-31

State v. Otis J. Martin
an affirmative duty to examine the record and question the defendant and/or counsel in open court: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31