Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11861 - 11870 of 40060 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 11861 - 11870 of 40060 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Snider
. No. 02-1628-CR 2 precludes a trial court from admitting a child-victim’s videotaped statement under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5374 - 2017-09-19
. No. 02-1628-CR 2 precludes a trial court from admitting a child-victim’s videotaped statement under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5374 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert L. Snider
-victim’s videotaped statement under the residual hearsay exception; (2) whether Snider’s counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5374 - 2005-03-31
-victim’s videotaped statement under the residual hearsay exception; (2) whether Snider’s counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5374 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Nelson
, and that the court should have excluded evidence about the victims’ prior statements. Nelson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20
, and that the court should have excluded evidence about the victims’ prior statements. Nelson’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3959 - 2017-09-20
State v. Mark Nelson
about the victims’ prior statements. Nelson’s motion for postconviction relief was denied by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
about the victims’ prior statements. Nelson’s motion for postconviction relief was denied by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
State v. James L. Neeley
] The State appeals from an order granting the motion of James Neeley to exclude a statement he made at his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13016 - 2005-03-31
] The State appeals from an order granting the motion of James Neeley to exclude a statement he made at his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13016 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
Brockdorf’s motion to suppress her October 3, 2003 statement, wherein she admitted that her earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7546 - 2017-09-19
Brockdorf’s motion to suppress her October 3, 2003 statement, wherein she admitted that her earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7546 - 2017-09-19
State v. Vanessa Brockdorf
October 3, 2003 statement, wherein she admitted that her earlier statement of September 19, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
October 3, 2003 statement, wherein she admitted that her earlier statement of September 19, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7546 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James L. Neeley
appeals from an order granting the motion of James Neeley to exclude a statement he made at his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13016 - 2017-09-21
appeals from an order granting the motion of James Neeley to exclude a statement he made at his initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13016 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
jail, where Armstrong was serving time for an unrelated offense. Armstrong made oral statements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17237 - 2017-09-21
jail, where Armstrong was serving time for an unrelated offense. Armstrong made oral statements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tonnie D. Armstrong
jail, where Armstrong was serving time for an unrelated offense. Armstrong made oral statements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17235 - 2017-09-21
jail, where Armstrong was serving time for an unrelated offense. Armstrong made oral statements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17235 - 2017-09-21