Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11861 - 11870 of 45843 for paternity test paper work.

Town of Dunn v. Michael L. Woodman
not demonstrate that the field sobriety tests he performed were probative of whether he had been driving while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15244 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Christopher A. Kitti
Kitti for OMVWI, the deputy had administered “another test … the breath test.” Kitti argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15381 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of Dunn v. Michael L. Woodman
probable cause because the Town did not demonstrate that the field sobriety tests he performed were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15244 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP2263-CR 2 results of her blood test because the implied consent law was violated when she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189490 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael D. Gundlach
was unlawfully detained after he successfully performed field sobriety tests; and 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9179 - 2017-09-19

[PDF]
to consent to provide a sample of his blood for a chemical test.2 On appeal, Ahmed argues that he properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776116 - 2024-03-14

[PDF] State v. Sandra L. Ludwigson
N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995), we set forth a three-pronged test to use when an allegedly intoxicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12075 - 2017-09-21

State v. Sandra L. Ludwigson
test to use when an allegedly intoxicated driver claims that a refusal to take a blood alcohol test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12075 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ricki D. Bunnell
to a chemical test.[1] Bunnell contends that because he already had submitted to an intoxilyzer test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12086 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lana Lanser
erred by limiting her cross-examination of the State’s blood alcohol test expert and by admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15498 - 2005-03-31