Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11861 - 11870 of 18793 for quote.

Frontsheet
, ¶26 (quoting State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58, ¶44, 271 Wis. 2d 633
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99312 - 2013-11-17

State v. Harris D. Byers
not as ambiguous as the quotation above would have us believe, but the quote makes a point: plain meaning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17549 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 90
process underpinning. ¶49 The Martin court quoted Block v. State, 41 Wis. 2d 205, 210, 163 N.W.2d 196
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84833 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984) (quoting United States v. Barnard, 490 F.2d 907, 912 (9th Cir. 1973
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33023 - 2008-06-16

Frontsheet
Wis. 2d 173, 696 N.W.2d 194 (quoting Miller, 231 Wis. 2d at 464). ¶29 This case involves a question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33408 - 2008-07-14

Frontsheet
,'" the statements are impermissible. Smith, 268 Wis. 2d 138, ¶23 (quoting State v. Draize, 88 Wis. 2d 445, 454, 276
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33040 - 2008-06-12

[PDF] WI 56
) (quoted source omitted). The "15 out of 22 months" timeframe did not create any new legal obligation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=376476 - 2021-08-02

[PDF] State v. Harris D. Byers
) (Justice Scalia's comments during a panel discussion) (quoted in Frank H. Easterbrook, What Does
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17549 - 2017-09-21

State v. John M. Kieffer
." Id. at 188 (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 (1968)) (internal quotation marks omitted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17077 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sherrie S. Tucker
Cir. 1994) (quoting Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 453 (1895)). ¶19 As illustrated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16455 - 2017-09-21