Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11871 - 11880 of 18727 for quote.

Jens O. Luebow v. Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
inferences.” Id. (quoted source omitted). Moreover, we cannot substitute our judgment for that of the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3660 - 2005-03-31

James T. Fritz v. Mary D. Fritz
. at 604, 258 N.W. at 848 (quoted source omitted). “It is, of course, entirely proper for parties to avoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13692 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 144
.’” Finkenbinder, 215 Wis. 2d at 150 (quoting DeGroff v. Schmude, 71 Wis. 2d 554, 568, 238 N.W.2d 730 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72535 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Cory T. Baker
discretion.’” Id. at ¶6 (quoting State v. Ferron, 219 Wis. 2d 481, 501, 579 N.W.2d 654 (1998)). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14871 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rules petition 07-09 supplemental commentary
of the just quoted clause. The proposed language does not limit the permitted activities of the person
/supreme/docs/0709comments2.pdf - 2010-02-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 466 U.S. at 694. Indeed, the Smith court quoted Strickland in explaining this premise. See Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977155 - 2025-07-01

[PDF] State v. Timothy B. Sullivan
to diminish significantly.” Id. at 148 (quoting Hampton v. State, 92 Wis. 2d 450, 461, 285 N.W.2d 868 (1979
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5784 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. P. P.
, ¶¶34-36, 41, 255 Wis. 2d 170, 648 N.W.2d 402. We agree. The County’s quote from B.L.J. (“One cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6875 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Scott J. Kilcoyne
marks and quoted source omitted). Third, without the testimony of Sara and Jamie, the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12744 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
.)2 After quoting § 767.51(3), the trial court concluded: “I guess I read the sole custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16245 - 2017-09-21