Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11871 - 11880 of 73646 for we.
Search results 11871 - 11880 of 73646 for we.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the petition because it was not verified as required by WIS. STAT. § 782.04 (2013-14). 2 We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158872 - 2017-09-21
the petition because it was not verified as required by WIS. STAT. § 782.04 (2013-14). 2 We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158872 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review, found for Team, and awarded $5250.50. As we conclude that § 801.15 does not apply in a ch. 799
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190821 - 2017-09-21
review, found for Team, and awarded $5250.50. As we conclude that § 801.15 does not apply in a ch. 799
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas Willan v. Columbia County
raises several issues. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from Willan’s request to Columbia County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2333 - 2017-09-19
raises several issues. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from Willan’s request to Columbia County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2333 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071113 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
litem fees. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 Borowski and Valerie Kufrin have had a long-running dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100544 - 2017-09-21
litem fees. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 Borowski and Valerie Kufrin have had a long-running dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darnell Hines
is whether Hines was denied effective assistance of counsel. Because we conclude that the performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13546 - 2017-09-21
is whether Hines was denied effective assistance of counsel. Because we conclude that the performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13546 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109194 - 2017-09-21
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109194 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2019AP1405 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297878 - 2020-10-21
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate No. 2019AP1405 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297878 - 2020-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in Wis. Stat. § 800.14. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Between August 2006 and June 2009, the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61920 - 2011-03-28
in Wis. Stat. § 800.14. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Between August 2006 and June 2009, the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61920 - 2011-03-28
CA Blank Order
request to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93275 - 2008-12-03
request to change his prison custody classification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93275 - 2008-12-03