Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11871 - 11880 of 72758 for we.
Search results 11871 - 11880 of 72758 for we.
Robert J. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrange
in concluding that the hearing examiner had acted contrary to law. We conclude that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14448 - 2005-03-31
in concluding that the hearing examiner had acted contrary to law. We conclude that the circuit court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14448 - 2005-03-31
City of Sheboygan v. Dale R. Mlejnek
that the arresting police officer had a reasonable basis for stopping Mlejnek’s vehicle. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14975 - 2005-03-31
that the arresting police officer had a reasonable basis for stopping Mlejnek’s vehicle. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14975 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James A. Tanksley
that the error was harmless. Because we cannot conclude that the error was harmless, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14797 - 2017-09-21
that the error was harmless. Because we cannot conclude that the error was harmless, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14797 - 2017-09-21
State v. James A. Tanksley
. Because we cannot conclude that the error was harmless, we reverse the convictions and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14797 - 2005-03-31
. Because we cannot conclude that the error was harmless, we reverse the convictions and remand the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14797 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s denial of his writ petition, he requests that we exercise our discretionary reversal authority
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540194 - 2022-07-06
court’s denial of his writ petition, he requests that we exercise our discretionary reversal authority
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540194 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Frank J. Endres
prior to administering a second breath test less than an hour after the first test was aborted. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14962 - 2017-09-21
prior to administering a second breath test less than an hour after the first test was aborted. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14962 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
with a car during a premeditated robbery. Because we conclude that it does not, we reverse. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144505 - 2015-07-21
with a car during a premeditated robbery. Because we conclude that it does not, we reverse. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144505 - 2015-07-21
[PDF]
Robert J. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrange
and that the court erred in concluding that the hearing examiner had acted contrary to law. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14448 - 2017-09-21
and that the court erred in concluding that the hearing examiner had acted contrary to law. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rudolph Konlock v. Anthony DePietro
not entitled to immunity under WIS. STAT. § 893.80 (2001-02). 1 We conclude that the appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6787 - 2017-09-20
not entitled to immunity under WIS. STAT. § 893.80 (2001-02). 1 We conclude that the appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6787 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
allegation that Chase’s attorneys had a conflict of interest. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135721 - 2015-02-25
allegation that Chase’s attorneys had a conflict of interest. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135721 - 2015-02-25