Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11881 - 11890 of 46101 for paternity test paper work.

County of Dane v. Christopher J. Campshure
to perform field sobriety tests converted the traffic stop into an arrest, and that the arrest was illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10399 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sara L. Lohry
to arrest her for OWI was based in part on field sobriety tests, and since the officer conducting the tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6789 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sara L. Lohry
on field sobriety tests, and since the officer conducting the tests was not certified to conduct them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6789 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that if the test results showed a negative presence for marijuana, it would negate Z.F.’s contention that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318262 - 2020-12-29

COURT OF APPEALS
. Mary Krueger appeals an order denying her Wis. Stat. § 974.07[1] postconviction motion for DNA testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143666 - 2015-06-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 974.071 postconviction motion for DNA testing. Krueger argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143666 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
prosecution, the results of a qualitative breath test (PBT), not approved for evidential use in Wisconsin
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115252 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David J. Roberson
Michael Terrell, who was working undercover as part of the same REDO team, and informed him
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25747 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or Monday for last minute, please, Judge, we got a deal worked out. I am simply not available. I am done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173787 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel J. Jurkovic
unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test in violation of Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (1997-98).[2] He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16299 - 2005-03-31