Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11891 - 11900 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 11891 - 11900 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
included fifteen years of initial confinement, would have been a de facto life sentence for him.5 Linder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319989 - 2021-01-05
included fifteen years of initial confinement, would have been a de facto life sentence for him.5 Linder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319989 - 2021-01-05
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law for de novo review. Konneker, 326 Wis. 2d 268, ¶23. We begin by examining any pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101610 - 2013-09-04
is a question of law for de novo review. Konneker, 326 Wis. 2d 268, ¶23. We begin by examining any pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101610 - 2013-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Thomas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35067 - 2008-12-29
review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. Thomas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35067 - 2008-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 466 U.S at 697. ¶21 In our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206767 - 2018-01-09
, 466 U.S at 697. ¶21 In our review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206767 - 2018-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and without use of Ikaria’s time, resources, or equipment, other than a de minimis number of articles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162589 - 2017-09-21
and without use of Ikaria’s time, resources, or equipment, other than a de minimis number of articles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
apply the same methodology as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36385 - 2014-09-15
apply the same methodology as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36385 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a constitutional question which we review de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29876 - 2014-09-15
is a constitutional question which we review de novo. See State v. Heft, 185 Wis. 2d 288, 296, 517 N.W.2d 494 (1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29876 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
findings as clearly erroneous. We review de novo the legal question whether the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49471 - 2014-09-15
findings as clearly erroneous. We review de novo the legal question whether the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49471 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Raymond D. Damouth
which we decide de novo. State v. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d 203, 211, 584 N.W.2d 553 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5523 - 2017-09-19
which we decide de novo. State v. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d 203, 211, 584 N.W.2d 553 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5523 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263058 - 2020-06-11
, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI 45, ¶39, 334 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263058 - 2020-06-11