Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 6309 for 208.

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Roger H. Schuett
the intent of the legislature in creating it. See Anderson v. City of Milwaukee, 208 Wis.2d 18, 25, 559 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12206 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court finds pertinent.” See id., 2008 WI App 80, ¶10, 312 Wis. 2d at 208–209, 752 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95671 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Diane M. Wettstaedt v. Gary E. Wettstaedt
-counting” on the present facts would be a proper exercise of discretion. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3250 - 2017-09-19

Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Caterpillar, Inc.
or stipulated facts are questions of law. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2211 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph Williams
in Williams’s co-defendant’s case, State v. Green, 208 Wis.2d 290, 560 N.W.2d 295 (Ct. App. 1997). In Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11239 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
5 Under State v. Cole, 208 Wis. 2d 328, 332, 559 N.W.2d 599 (Ct. App. 1997) the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34444 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473-74, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997). Corroboration requires “(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338673 - 2021-02-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997). If the defendant satisfies these criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98322 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 208, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89341 - 2014-09-15

Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Kenneth P. Mader
the intent of the legislature in creating it. See Anderson v. City of Milwaukee, 208 Wis.2d 18, 25, 559 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12140 - 2005-03-31