Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 4807 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Mowewe Kolaka Timur.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 4807 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Mowewe Kolaka Timur.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
County: Patricia D. mcmahon, Judge. Affirmed; request for double costs granted. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2007-03-19
County: Patricia D. mcmahon, Judge. Affirmed; request for double costs granted. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2007-03-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for reconsideration challenging the termination of maintenance, denying double No. 2007AP1609 2 damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35958 - 2014-09-15
for reconsideration challenging the termination of maintenance, denying double No. 2007AP1609 2 damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35958 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a rental dispute with Kennedy that awarded back rent and double rent to the City. We reversed the award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35196 - 2009-01-12
a rental dispute with Kennedy that awarded back rent and double rent to the City. We reversed the award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35196 - 2009-01-12
State v. Andrew B. Collette
postconviction counsel was ineffective, that the sentencing violated his double jeopardy protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3645 - 2005-03-31
postconviction counsel was ineffective, that the sentencing violated his double jeopardy protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3645 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. Winkel
than doubled without adequate explanation by Attorney Winkel, the fee application misrepresented
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20615 - 2005-12-12
than doubled without adequate explanation by Attorney Winkel, the fee application misrepresented
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20615 - 2005-12-12
State v. Jovan T. Mull
postconviction motion. He raises seven issues: (1) whether his constitutional double jeopardy rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4632 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion. He raises seven issues: (1) whether his constitutional double jeopardy rights were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4632 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard L. Munson
multiplicitous, in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. We reject the arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10678 - 2005-03-31
multiplicitous, in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. We reject the arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10678 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jovan T. Mull
issues: (1) whether his constitutional double jeopardy rights were violated when he was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4632 - 2017-09-19
issues: (1) whether his constitutional double jeopardy rights were violated when he was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4632 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
; request for double costs granted. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 FINE, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28466 - 2014-09-15
; request for double costs granted. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 FINE, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28466 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The doctrine’s underlying purpose is to prevent double recovery. Id.3 ¶11 We explained in Scheideler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15
). The doctrine’s underlying purpose is to prevent double recovery. Id.3 ¶11 We explained in Scheideler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80533 - 2014-09-15