Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 82341 for case code.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 82341 for case code.
[PDF]
Mary Kay McCallum v. Marathon County Board of Adjustment
to MARATHON COUNTY, WIS., ZONING CODE §17.08 (1998), “special exception” is defined as follows: “Uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4015 - 2017-09-20
to MARATHON COUNTY, WIS., ZONING CODE §17.08 (1998), “special exception” is defined as follows: “Uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4015 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI App 48
) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which provides that: In a case referred to it, the Court of Criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191652 - 2018-08-22
) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which provides that: In a case referred to it, the Court of Criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191652 - 2018-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS
real property construction activity. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns a Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
real property construction activity. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns a Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
This case concerns a Department of Revenue assessment of sales and use taxes against Visu-Sewer. Visu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30503 - 2014-09-15
This case concerns a Department of Revenue assessment of sales and use taxes against Visu-Sewer. Visu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
is in the best interest of the child.” Sec. 767.451(1)(b)2.b. ¶18 In this case, Gregerson does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350816 - 2021-03-30
is in the best interest of the child.” Sec. 767.451(1)(b)2.b. ¶18 In this case, Gregerson does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350816 - 2021-03-30
[PDF]
John Marder v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
2005 WI 159 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2003AP2755 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20437 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 159 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2003AP2755 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20437 - 2017-09-21
John Marder v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
to Marder's case. However, it held that the applicable administrative code provisions, § UWS 4, and Marder's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20437 - 2005-11-28
to Marder's case. However, it held that the applicable administrative code provisions, § UWS 4, and Marder's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20437 - 2005-11-28
Must a judge testify when subpoenaed?
case. The judge may be asked to testify as to facts and character. The judge is not hearing the case
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=903 - 2005-03-31
case. The judge may be asked to testify as to facts and character. The judge is not hearing the case
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=903 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
2008 WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP934 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32107 - 2008-04-29
2008 WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP934 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32107 - 2008-04-29
[PDF]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15