Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 30059 for de.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Dale H. Krause
resentencingis an issue of law that this court reviews de novo. The State submits that the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15958 - 2017-09-21
resentencingis an issue of law that this court reviews de novo. The State submits that the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15958 - 2017-09-21
William A. Wulf v. City of Merrill
of their discretionary method of plowing snow. ¶3 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15901 - 2005-03-31
of their discretionary method of plowing snow. ¶3 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15901 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Lewis Small, Jr. v. Wtmj Television Station
de novo by the appellate court. Anderson v. Milwaukee Ins., 161 Wis.2d 766, 769, 468 N.W.2d 766
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8728 - 2017-09-19
de novo by the appellate court. Anderson v. Milwaukee Ins., 161 Wis.2d 766, 769, 468 N.W.2d 766
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8728 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court.2 Frost
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93779 - 2014-09-15
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court.2 Frost
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93779 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is procedurally barred by Escalona–Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179971 - 2017-09-21
is procedurally barred by Escalona–Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179971 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48003 - 2010-03-17
of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. Van De Hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48003 - 2010-03-17
State v. Romaine A. Langham
. Thus, our review is de novo. State v. Swiams, 2004 WI App 217, ¶5, 277 Wis. 2d 400, 404, 690 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25668 - 2006-07-25
. Thus, our review is de novo. State v. Swiams, 2004 WI App 217, ¶5, 277 Wis. 2d 400, 404, 690 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25668 - 2006-07-25
Patricia S. Vander Bloemen v. State of Wisconsin Deparment of Natural Resources
a question of law which we review de novo. Ours is not a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9270 - 2012-04-09
a question of law which we review de novo. Ours is not a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9270 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
Bud Meyer v. Racine County
. ¶5 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6097 - 2017-09-19
. ¶5 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6097 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48003 - 2014-09-15
from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48003 - 2014-09-15