Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 8225 for gf-175.

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
it, as required by WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(c). See, e.g., State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366, 370–371, 498 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5545 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
it, as required by WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(c). See, e.g., State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366, 370–371, 498 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
not orally explain it, as required by Wis. Stat. § 971.08(1)(c). See, e.g., State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5544 - 2005-03-31

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
not orally explain it, as required by Wis. Stat. § 971.08(1)(c). See, e.g., State v. Chavez, 175 Wis. 2d 366
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5545 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
exercise of discretion. State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis. 2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262 (Ct. App. 1992) (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=279422 - 2020-08-18

Ricky L. Heath v. Avco Financial Services of Wisconsin, Inc.
the trial court’s decision, State v. Echols, 175 Wis.2d 653, 672-73, 499 N.W.2d 631, 636 (1993), here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13472 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Aaron O. Schreiber
and the need to protect the public. State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 682, 499 N.W.2d 631 (1993). Elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4049 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
and explain how each element translated into a specific sentence length. See State v. Fisher, 2005 WI App 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91910 - 2013-01-22

State v. Aaron O. Schreiber
, the defendant’s character and rehabilitative needs and the need to protect the public. State v. Echols, 175 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4049 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
v. Fisher, 2005 WI App 175, ¶21, 285 Wis. 2d 433, 447, 702 N.W.2d 56, 63. Griggs is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91910 - 2014-09-15