Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 57333 for id.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 57333 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id., ¶¶4, 8, 19. An officer asked Sykes for identification and Sykes stated it was not on him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131303 - 2017-09-21
. Id., ¶¶4, 8, 19. An officer asked Sykes for identification and Sykes stated it was not on him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131303 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
deference. Id. ¶5 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28738 - 2014-09-15
deference. Id. ¶5 The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28738 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
into an arrest. Id. at 450-51. We noted the standard for determining whether someone is under arrest is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35890 - 2009-03-16
into an arrest. Id. at 450-51. We noted the standard for determining whether someone is under arrest is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35890 - 2009-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether those facts constitute reasonable suspicion for the investigatory stop. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91561 - 2014-09-15
review de novo whether those facts constitute reasonable suspicion for the investigatory stop. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91561 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
an investigative stop into an arrest. Id. at 450-51. We noted the standard for determining whether someone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35890 - 2014-09-15
an investigative stop into an arrest. Id. at 450-51. We noted the standard for determining whether someone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35890 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo whether those facts constitute reasonable suspicion for the investigatory stop. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91561 - 2013-01-14
review de novo whether those facts constitute reasonable suspicion for the investigatory stop. Id. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91561 - 2013-01-14
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to medicate/treat even when there is no finding of dangerousness—— the general welfare of the prisoner." Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257780 - 2020-05-28
to medicate/treat even when there is no finding of dangerousness—— the general welfare of the prisoner." Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257780 - 2020-05-28
State v. David G.K.
a defendant has relied. Id. ¶9 David contends that the State knowingly elicited testimony from T.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2777 - 2005-03-31
a defendant has relied. Id. ¶9 David contends that the State knowingly elicited testimony from T.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kirk W. Holstein
, is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal, Holstein posits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4957 - 2017-09-19
, is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal, Holstein posits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4957 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert C. Deilke
material to warrant releasing the party, whether prosecution or defense, from its promises. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5824 - 2005-03-31
material to warrant releasing the party, whether prosecution or defense, from its promises. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5824 - 2005-03-31