Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 3827 for injunction.
Search results 1191 - 1200 of 3827 for injunction.
[PDF]
Amerco Real Estate Company v. 525 Properties Limited Partnership
the affirmative defenses asserted by 525; and (3) the trial court should have granted Amerco an injunction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12681 - 2017-09-21
the affirmative defenses asserted by 525; and (3) the trial court should have granted Amerco an injunction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12681 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Arnold E. Smith v. Douglas G. Slock
, seeking an injunction prohibiting the Slocks from parking within five feet of the property line. As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10807 - 2017-09-20
, seeking an injunction prohibiting the Slocks from parking within five feet of the property line. As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10807 - 2017-09-20
Amerco Real Estate Company v. 525 Properties Limited Partnership
defenses asserted by 525; and (3) the trial court should have granted Amerco an injunction ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12681 - 2005-03-31
defenses asserted by 525; and (3) the trial court should have granted Amerco an injunction ordering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12681 - 2005-03-31
Alice Vogel v. Town of Farmington
] The trial court properly denied an injunction closing the road. We review a decision whether to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7940 - 2005-03-31
] The trial court properly denied an injunction closing the road. We review a decision whether to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7940 - 2005-03-31
Racine County v. Mario V. Lena
in the amount of $16,850 and a permanent injunction requiring him to comply with the conditions recited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3152 - 2005-03-31
in the amount of $16,850 and a permanent injunction requiring him to comply with the conditions recited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3152 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
abuse injunction in 2006, and whose first postconviction motion did not raise any sentencing issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99723 - 2014-09-15
abuse injunction in 2006, and whose first postconviction motion did not raise any sentencing issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99723 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a domestic abuse injunction in 2006, and whose first postconviction motion did not raise any sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99723 - 2013-07-22
a domestic abuse injunction in 2006, and whose first postconviction motion did not raise any sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99723 - 2013-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
violating a domestic abuse injunction and one count of battery to an injunction petitioner. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244106 - 2019-07-23
violating a domestic abuse injunction and one count of battery to an injunction petitioner. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244106 - 2019-07-23
Arnold E. Smith v. Douglas G. Slock
the underlying action, seeking an injunction prohibiting the Slocks from parking within five feet of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-11-15
the underlying action, seeking an injunction prohibiting the Slocks from parking within five feet of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and did not impose a sentence on that count. Two counts of violating a harassment injunction were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168203 - 2017-09-21
and did not impose a sentence on that count. Two counts of violating a harassment injunction were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168203 - 2017-09-21