Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11901 - 11910 of 26057 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 11901 - 11910 of 26057 for bench warrant/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
worthless, and barely sufficient to support the issuance of a search warrant for child pornography.[6] Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103080 - 2013-10-14
worthless, and barely sufficient to support the issuance of a search warrant for child pornography.[6] Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103080 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
the claimed error was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.” State v. Sigarroa, 2004 WI App 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56183 - 2010-11-01
the claimed error was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.” State v. Sigarroa, 2004 WI App 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56183 - 2010-11-01
State v. Jeff S. Mohr
and articulable facts which, taken with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15913 - 2005-03-31
and articulable facts which, taken with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15913 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William R. Junnor
warranting the arrest and subsequent search. ¶9 Thus, the trial court found that Junnor consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
warranting the arrest and subsequent search. ¶9 Thus, the trial court found that Junnor consented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Corey
without a warrant for the violation of a traffic regulation if the traffic officer has reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14717 - 2017-09-21
without a warrant for the violation of a traffic regulation if the traffic officer has reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14717 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the motion hearing. Drake’s disagreement with the court’s conclusion that his arguments did not warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
the motion hearing. Drake’s disagreement with the court’s conclusion that his arguments did not warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
Rebecca Laluzerne v. Larry Stange
a finding that an injunction was warranted against Stange. Therefore, we reverse the order and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9248 - 2005-03-31
a finding that an injunction was warranted against Stange. Therefore, we reverse the order and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9248 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 2
that the seriousness of Attorney Engelbrecht's misconduct warrants the suspension of his license to practice law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27678 - 2014-09-15
that the seriousness of Attorney Engelbrecht's misconduct warrants the suspension of his license to practice law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27678 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James Welch
verify the validity of Welch’s license and check them all for warrants. Alt did this because Jennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5123 - 2017-09-19
verify the validity of Welch’s license and check them all for warrants. Alt did this because Jennings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5123 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case,” and warranted a term of more than just “one or two years.” Furthermore, with regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823702 - 2024-07-09
case,” and warranted a term of more than just “one or two years.” Furthermore, with regard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823702 - 2024-07-09