Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11901 - 11910 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 11901 - 11910 of 64027 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
by failing to subpoena witnesses and exculpatory phone records for the trial in one of the prosecutions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14172 - 2014-09-15
by failing to subpoena witnesses and exculpatory phone records for the trial in one of the prosecutions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14172 - 2014-09-15
Rev. Thomas Ponchik v. John J. Eversman
record before us is inadequate for due process purposes, we reverse and remand with directions. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11553 - 2005-03-31
record before us is inadequate for due process purposes, we reverse and remand with directions. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2015-16 version. No. 2017AP209-CRNM 2 reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202629 - 2017-11-22
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2015-16 version. No. 2017AP209-CRNM 2 reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202629 - 2017-11-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035340 - 2025-11-12
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035340 - 2025-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
, voluntarily and intelligently entered, despite the inadequacy of the record at the time of the plea's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10876 - 2017-09-20
, voluntarily and intelligently entered, despite the inadequacy of the record at the time of the plea's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10876 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the facts in the record.” Id. ¶4 After hearing Burtch’s testimony about his experience, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187156 - 2017-09-21
of the facts in the record.” Id. ¶4 After hearing Burtch’s testimony about his experience, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP331-CRNM 2 review of the Record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694043 - 2023-08-23
. No. 2022AP331-CRNM 2 review of the Record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694043 - 2023-08-23
CA Blank Order
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117321 - 2014-07-14
was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117321 - 2014-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238652 - 2019-04-03
the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238652 - 2019-04-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
was unreasonable and substantial. However, he contends that nothing in the record provides a factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46317 - 2014-09-15
was unreasonable and substantial. However, he contends that nothing in the record provides a factual basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46317 - 2014-09-15